Are you using generic BitTitan project names that make it hard to locate the correct project quickly during a live cutover?

During active migration windows, project names are the primary way you identify and navigate work in the BitTitan portal. If you have projects named Migration Project 1 and Migration Project 2, they are effectively indistinguishable, especially when it is 2 AM and you are switching between two simultaneous acquisition migrations while watching throughput.

A practical naming convention includes the source tenant domain, destination tenant domain, workload type, and migration phase in the project name. With that structure, a mailbox pre-stage project is recognizable at a glance without opening it to confirm which tenant pair it covers.

Clear naming also speeds up support interactions. When you open a BitTitan support case and reference a project, a descriptive project name helps support engineers find the correct configuration faster than relying on a project ID alone.

Define and document the naming standard in the migration runbook before creating any projects. Renaming projects mid-migration is usually simple, but it adds friction at exactly the time you want everything to be unambiguous.

What naming convention are you using for your BitTitan migration projects?

#BitTitan #MigrationWiz