If your BitTitan cost estimate is based only on user count, you are likely missing factors that materially impact total project cost.

BitTitan migration cost typically breaks down into four main components: UMB licensing based on destination object count, DeploymentPro licensing if endpoint automation is in scope, MSPComplete licensing if multi-customer management is needed, and any BitTitan support tier cost if you add a premium support agreement.

Several variables commonly shift the estimate: shared mailboxes that require UMBs but were not included in the initial object count, accounts added to scope after you already purchased licensing, UMB needs for resource mailboxes such as room and equipment accounts, and license term alignment issues if the migration extends beyond the initial 12-month UMB term.

As a concrete example, in a 300-account migration where the initial estimate was based on licensed users, identifying 40 shared mailboxes later increases UMB cost by 13 percent even though the intended migration scope has not changed. That variance should be anticipated and budgeted from the start by doing a full object audit in the source tenant.

Once you have a complete inventory, BitTitan licensing is generally straightforward. Estimate accuracy is largely a function of how thorough your pre-migration source tenant audit is.

Are you building your BitTitan cost estimate from a complete source tenant object audit that includes every object type requiring a UMB?

#BitTitan #MigrationWiz