When a BitTitan migration program ends, do you leave without writing down the decisions and findings the next migration engineer will need?

Enterprise BitTitan programs often change hands midstream. Engineers move on, contractors roll off, and the IT staff supporting the effort can shift between pre-stage and cutover. If key decisions are not documented, the next person inherits a BitTitan portal full of settings with no context for why anything is configured the way it is.

Useful knowledge transfer documentation should cover: the source and destination tenant architecture including relevant RBAC assignments and CA exclusions; the reasoning behind each BitTitan project configuration choice including why certain workloads were excluded from scope; the pre-migration assessment results and how they shaped the approach; the wave design and the criteria used to place users into each wave; problems encountered during pre-stage and how they were resolved; and the status of every pre-stage pass including measured throughput data.

This does not need to be long, but it does need enough detail for an incoming engineer to understand the current state and keep executing without a two-hour onboarding call.

Is your BitTitan migration program documented well enough that a new engineer could take over tomorrow without a handoff call?

#BitTitan #MigrationWiz